In Alabama Ruling, Supreme Court Signals Limited Role for Federal Courts in Redistricting Fights
The New York Times • Politics • 1 hour ago
In an emergency ruling on Tuesday night, the court’s conservative majority gave a first glimpse into congressional district battles under a weakened Voting Rights Act.
Related News
House Passes Iran War Powers Resolution in Bipartisan Rebuke to Trump
A measure to direct an end to U.S. engagement in Iran was adopted with a handful of Republicans in support, sending a s…
The New York Times
• 8 minutes ago
The GOP-led House voted to restrict President Trump’s ability to continue the war against Iran without congressional approval, the latest sign that Republican lawmakers’ support for the war is eroding
The effort to constrain the White House comes as the war has morphed from a heavy bombing campaign to a fragile ceasefi…
Obscure Group With Trump Ties Plans to Route Funds to His Allies for Legal Fights
A nonprofit called the Lawfare Defense Fund has raised $36 million to support those who consider themselves unjust vict…
The New York Times
• 34 minutes ago
In a private meeting, Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner attempted to quell concerns from some Democratic lawmakers that revelations about his life have jeopardized his candidacy
The Maine Senate candidate told Democratic lawmakers, “The worst of the rumors we’ve all heard are not true.”
Trump Signs Executive Order Removing Job Protections From Federal Workers
The order is a response to resistance during the first Trump administration, when senior career government officials ro…
The New York Times
• 1 hour ago
‘I Love It’: Trump Is Still in Favor of $1.8 Billion Payout Fund
Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, said on Tuesday that the administration was “not moving forward with the fun…
The New York Times
• 1 hour ago